I stumbled across <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidbrier_this-ceo-deleted-80-of-their-products-activity-7349387418845818880-xvxO">this viral business post</a> the other day, and honestly? It got me fired up.The post was all about how Steve Jobs saved Apple by killing 340 products. How Trader Joe's wins with 4,000 products instead of 50,000. How In-N-Out crushes McDonald's with just four menu items.The message was clear: Delete everything. Focus is magic. Complexity is evil.And you know what? Part of me wanted to stand up and applaud.But then I caught myself thinking: "Wait a minute. Is this actually true? Or are we getting seduced by another oversimplified business fairy tale?"<h2 id="64e1e2e0-844f-4be9-bdfe-66b59e62eee5" data-toc-id="64e1e2e0-844f-4be9-bdfe-66b59e62eee5">The Seductive Power of Subtraction Stories</h2>Let's be honest. We're suckers for these stories.There's something deeply satisfying about the idea that success comes from cutting, not adding. It appeals to our desire for clarity in a complicated world. It makes us feel like we've discovered some secret formula that everyone else is too chicken to try.The Apple story is particularly intoxicating. Picture this: Jobs walks back into a dying company, takes one look at 350 products, and says, "Nope. Ten. That's it."Boom. iPod. Stock up 3,000%. Company saved.It's the business equivalent of a superhero origin story.But here's where things get interesting. And a little uncomfortable.<h2 id="4e7975b3-1a7a-4614-a307-5268542ad359" data-toc-id="4e7975b3-1a7a-4614-a307-5268542ad359">The Uncomfortable Truth About Universal Truths</h2>I've seen this pattern before. Someone finds a handful of compelling examples, packages them into a "framework," and suddenly we have a new universal law of business.The problem? Business doesn't really do universal laws.Sure, the deletion strategy worked brilliantly for Apple. But Apple in 1997 was facing bankruptcy. When you're bleeding money and have zero focus, radical surgery makes perfect sense.But what about when you're not dying?<h2 id="52eac561-0883-469b-ae1f-8421f400b6ad" data-toc-id="52eac561-0883-469b-ae1f-8421f400b6ad">When More Actually Is More</h2>Let me tell you about a company that would laugh at the "deletion audit framework."Amazon.Jeff Bezos didn't build the world's most valuable company by focusing on ten products. He built it by becoming the "everything store." Books, electronics, groceries, cloud computing, streaming, logistics, advertising – you name it.If Bezos had followed the deletion playbook, we'd still be buying books from Amazon and wondering why our packages take two weeks to arrive.Here's another one: Microsoft.Bill Gates didn't conquer the world by making one perfect product. He created an ecosystem. Windows, Office, servers, databases, development tools, gaming consoles, cloud services. Each piece reinforced the others.And guess what? It worked.<h2 id="a67de688-5478-40e0-9659-3fe254ab271a" data-toc-id="a67de688-5478-40e0-9659-3fe254ab271a">The Nuance Nobody Talks About</h2>The viral post I mentioned makes this bold claim: "Addition is lazy. Subtraction is strategy."But that's not quite right, is it?Sometimes addition is strategy. Sometimes subtraction is just giving up.The real question isn't whether you should have more products or fewer products. It's whether you understand why you have the products you have.<h2 id="0a8fecd2-25f8-4355-8730-69318292f52c" data-toc-id="0a8fecd2-25f8-4355-8730-69318292f52c">The Three Contexts Where Less Really Is More</h2>Don't get me wrong. There are absolutely situations where the deletion strategy works like magic:<ul><li>Context 1: The Turnaround - When you're Apple in 1997, bleeding cash and losing focus, radical cuts save your life. You can't afford to do everything mediocrely. You need to do something exceptionally well, fast.</li><li>Context 2: The Choice Overload Market - Some customers genuinely suffer from too many options. Ever stood in the cereal aisle at a grocery store and felt overwhelmed? That's where Trader Joe's wins. They've pre-curated everything for you.</li><li>Context 3: The Premium Brand Play - When you're positioning yourself as the best at something specific, breadth can hurt your credibility. In-N-Out doesn't need 50 menu items because they're saying, "We're the best at burgers, fries, and shakes. Period."</li></ul><h2 id="2ebbe52e-3b73-40d0-ade6-9ab71af2d0f0" data-toc-id="2ebbe52e-3b73-40d0-ade6-9ab71af2d0f0">The Three Contexts Where More Actually Is More</h2>But here's what the deletion evangelists don't tell you:<ul><li>Context 1: The Portfolio Play - If you're a pharmaceutical company, you can't just focus on one drug. Patents expire. Treatments get superseded. You need a pipeline of products at different stages to survive.</li><li>Context 2: The Platform Strategy - Some businesses win by being the one-stop shop. Amazon didn't accidentally become huge in cloud computing. They built it to support their retail business, then realized they could sell it to everyone else.</li><li>Context 3: The Risk Distribution Game - When you're serving multiple markets or customer segments, diversification isn't complexity for the sake of complexity. It's insurance. If one market tanks, you've got others to fall back on.</li></ul><h2 id="e96f7c82-5631-4e2f-9455-0584334a8c9a" data-toc-id="e96f7c82-5631-4e2f-9455-0584334a8c9a">The Real Framework: Context, Not Commandments</h2>Here's what I think the real framework should look like:<ul><li>Step 1: Know Your Situation - Are you in crisis mode? Are you trying to break into a new market? Are you defending an existing position? The answer changes everything.</li><li>Step 2: Understand Your Customer - Do they want simplicity or selection? Are they experts who know exactly what they need, or beginners who need guidance? One size doesn't fit all.</li><li>Step 3: Look at Your Economics - Some businesses have high fixed costs and low marginal costs. For them, more products can be incredibly profitable. Others have high marginal costs. For them, focus makes sense.</li><li>Step 4: Consider Your Competitive Landscape - If everyone else is focused, maybe breadth is your advantage. If everyone else is broad, maybe focus is your edge.</li></ul><h2 id="0ba15b09-badf-44a8-9aca-d6ac26a471ba" data-toc-id="0ba15b09-badf-44a8-9aca-d6ac26a471ba">The Danger of Deletion Dogma</h2>You know what worries me most about the "deletion is always good" narrative?It gives people permission to stop thinking.Instead of wrestling with the messy reality of their specific situation, they can just apply the framework. Cut 80%. Keep 20%. Problem solved.But business is messier than that.Sometimes you need to add before you can subtract. Sometimes you need to experiment with breadth before you can intelligently focus. Sometimes complexity is actually serving your customers, even if it's making your life harder.<h2 id="880fde53-7222-40f2-a2f5-221b4d63648b" data-toc-id="880fde53-7222-40f2-a2f5-221b4d63648b">The Lesson Hidden in Plain Sight</h2>Here's what I think the real lesson is:The most successful companies aren't the ones with the most products or the fewest products. They're the ones with the most intentional products.Apple succeeded not because they had ten products instead of 350. They succeeded because those ten products were chosen with incredible intentionality. Each one served a clear purpose. Each one reinforced the others.Amazon succeeds not because they have everything, but because everything they have serves their core mission of being the most customer-centric company on Earth.The magic isn't in the number. It's in the thinking behind the number.<h2 id="47c25eae-cbec-4950-846a-25e436beb10b" data-toc-id="47c25eae-cbec-4950-846a-25e436beb10b">Your Move (But Not This Weekend)</h2>The original post ended with this dramatic call to action: "List everything you offer. Circle what would hurt if it died. Kill everything else. This weekend."But here's my counter-proposal:List everything you offer. Ask why each thing exists. Understand the role it plays in your overall strategy. Figure out if it's serving your customers or just serving your ego.Then make changes gradually. Test. Learn. Iterate.Because unlike the viral post suggests, good strategy isn't about having the courage to delete everything.It's about having the wisdom to know what to keep, what to kill, and when to do each.And that, my friend, is a lot more nuanced than a weekend project.<h2 id="83b8f690-6e41-49cd-aa47-01fa8f0da733" data-toc-id="83b8f690-6e41-49cd-aa47-01fa8f0da733">The Bottom Line</h2>The deletion strategy isn't wrong. It's just incomplete.Sometimes less is more. Sometimes more is more. Sometimes the answer is somewhere in between.The companies that figure this out? They're the ones that actually dominate tomorrow.Not because they have the most. Not because they have the least.But because they have exactly what their customers need, exactly when they need it.And that's a much more interesting challenge than just hitting delete.

Steve Jobs saved Apple by cutting 340 products, but is deletion always the answer? Discover when to focus vs. diversify in business strategy decisions.

The Deletion Delusion: Why "Less is More" Isn't Always More

The Seductive Power of Subtraction Stories

The Uncomfortable Truth About Universal Truths

The Three Contexts Where Less Really Is More

The Three Contexts Where More Actually Is More

The Real Framework: Context, Not Commandments

Learn how to grow and scale your online course business using our online course platform. EzyCourse blog is designed to teach you how to create and sell online courses.

The Deletion Delusion: Why "Less is More" Isn't Always More

The Deletion Delusion: Why "Less is More" Isn't Always More

Related Posts